Conversation Rules IT by Leonardo Boselli

Version 7/140608

"Translation in italian of Version 7 of Conversation Rules by Eric Eve. A way of controlling conversations using rules and tables. Also implements topic suggestions and Conversation nodes. Requires Plurality by Emily Short and Conversation Framework, Epistemology and List Control by Eric Eve."

Error

Includes and Included by are omitted for modules with errors

ni

++ 0% (Reading text)
++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
++ 20% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 23% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 26% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 29% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 32% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 35% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 38% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 41% (Generating code)
++ 44% (Generating code)
++ 47% (Generating code)
++ 50% (Generating code)
++ 53% (Generating code)
++ 56% (Generating code)
++ 59% (Generating code)
++ 62% (Generating code)
++ 65% (Generating code)
++ 68% (Generating code)
++ 71% (Generating code)
++ 74% (Generating code)
++ 77% (Generating code)
++ 80% (Generating code)
++ 83% (Generating code)
++ 86% (Generating code)
++ 89% (Generating code)
++ 92% (Generating code)
++ 95% (Generating code)
++ 98% (Generating code)


In the line '"[The noun] non [rispondi]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'rispondi' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'rispondi' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sei] nessun altro [qui]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ci
sei' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say'
that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sei' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sei] nessun altro [qui]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'qui'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'qui' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'saluti' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'saluti' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to
say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this
happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sei] stata risposta."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ci
sei' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say'
that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sei' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sei] stata risposta."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ci
sei' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say'
that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sei' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[Qui] non [regarding nothing][ci sei] nessuno a cui
parlare."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'Qui'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'Qui' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[Qui] non [regarding nothing][ci sei] nessuno a cui
parlare."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ci
sei' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say'
that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sei' as a value of some kind (because
it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"(rivolgendoti [ap the interlocutor])"' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ap
the interlocutor' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any
form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ap the interlocutor' as a
value of some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make
sense of it that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation
has gone wrong - for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop
at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] parlando con nessuno."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'te'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'te' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stesso' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stesso' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'sei'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'sei' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] scolo] già
parlando [ap the noun]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] scolo] già
parlando [ap the noun]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] scolo] già
parlando [ap the noun]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] scolo] già
parlando [ap the noun]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ap
the noun' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ap the noun' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'te'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'te' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stesso' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stesso' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Parlare a [regarding the player][t [...] [regarding
nothing][sei] inutile."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'sei'
would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that
I know. So I tried to read 'sei' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'saluti' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'saluti' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to
say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this
happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][saluti][maiuscolo] [the
noun]."' conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'maiuscolo' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some kind (because it's legal
to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes
this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've
omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"[regarding the player][maiuscolo][ [...] do con [the
current interlocutor]."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'maiuscolo' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form
of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'maiuscolo' as a value of some
kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that
way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong -
for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"(rivolgendoti [ap the noun])"' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'ap
the noun' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ap the noun' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] parlando [ap the noun]."'
conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'stai' would be something
to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried
to read 'stai' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to say values),
but couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this happens
because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've omitted a
semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] parlando [ap the noun]."'
conversation
framework it by leonardo boselli, I was expecting that 'ap the noun' would be
something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know.
So I tried to read 'ap the noun' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] parlando con nessuno."' conversation framework it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that
'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of
'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding nothing][ci sono] risposta."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 33),
I was expecting that 'ci sono' would be something to 'say', but it didn't
look like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ci sono' as a
value of some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make
sense of it that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation
has gone wrong - for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop
at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"Non [regarding the player][stai] conversando con
nessuno."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 34),
I was expecting that 'stai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look
like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'stai' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[Ora] non [regarding the player][h [...] re con [the
current interlocutor]."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 35),
I was expecting that 'Ora' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look
like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'Ora' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"[Ora] non [regarding the player][h [...] re con [the
current interlocutor]."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 35),
I was expecting that 'hai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look
like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'hai' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"([regarding the player][puoi] "' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 36),
I was expecting that 'puoi' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look
like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'puoi' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"chiedere [ap the current interlocutor] di "' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 40),
I was expecting that 'ap the current interlocutor' would be something to
'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to
read 'ap the current interlocutor' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"parlare [ap the current interlocutor] di "' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 42),
I was expecting that 'ap the current interlocutor' would be something to
'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to
read 'ap the current interlocutor' as a value of some kind (because it's
legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way either.
Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for instance,
if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"'[if saying yes]Sì[otherwise]No[en [...] iesto nulla',
[hai] puntualizzato."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 44),
I was expecting that 'hai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look
like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'hai' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"'[if saying yes]Sì[otherwise]No[en [...] iesto nulla',
[hai] puntualizzato."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 44),
I was expecting that 'ti' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look
like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'ti' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"'[if saying yes]Sì[otherwise]No[en [...] iesto nulla',
[hai] puntualizzato."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 44),
I was expecting that 'hai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look
like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'hai' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.


In the line '"'[if saying yes]Sì[otherwise]No[en [...] iesto nulla',
[hai] puntualizzato."' (Leonardo Boselli/Conversation Rules IT.i7x, line 44),
I was expecting that 'hai' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look
like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'hai' as a value of
some kind (because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it
that way either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong
- for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of
the 'say' phrase.
++ Ended: Translation failed: 46 problems found
Copy Include Conversation Rules IT by Leonardo Boselli to clipboard Include Conversation Rules IT by Leonardo Boselli.
Read the original documentation of Version 7 of Conversation Rules by Eric Eve.
Version 7/140608 of Conversation Rules IT by Leonardo Boselli begins here.

"Translation in italian of Version 7 of Conversation Rules by Eric Eve.

A way of controlling conversations using rules and tables. Also implements topic suggestions and Conversation nodes. Requires Plurality by Emily Short and Conversation Framework, Epistemology and List Control by Eric Eve."

Book 1 - Includes

Include Conversation Rules by Eric Eve.

Include Conversation Framework IT by Leonardo Boselli.


Book 2 - Conversation Model

Part 4 - Suggesting Topics

Understand "argomenti" or "argo" as requesting suggested topics.


Book 3 - Additional Grammar


Understand "chiedi a/al/allo/alla/ai/agli/alle/all [someone] di/del/dello/della/dei/degli/delle/dell [any primary known thing]" as quizzing it about.
Understand "chiedi [any primary known thing]" as implicit-quizzing.
Understand "chiedi di/del/dello/della/dei/degli/delle/dell [any primary known thing]" as implicit-quizzing.
Understand "parla a/al/allo/alla/ai/agli/alle/all [someone] di/del/dello/della/dei/degli/delle/dell [any primary known thing]" as informing it about.
Understand "parla di/del/dello/della/dei/degli/delle/dell [any primary known thing]" as implicit-informing.


Chapter - Responses

     default no response rule response (A) is "Non [regarding nothing][ci sono] risposta.".
     can't suggest if no interlocutor rule response (A) is "Non [regarding the player][stai] conversando con nessuno.".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (A) is "[Ora] non [regarding the player][hai] nulla da discutere con [the current interlocutor].".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (B) is "([regarding the player][puoi] ".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (C) is "[suggestions of the current convnode]".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (D) is ")".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (E) is ", o ".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (F) is "chiedere [ap the current interlocutor] di ".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (G) is ", o ".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (H) is "parlare [ap the current interlocutor] di ".
     standard list suggested topics rule response (I) is ")".
     saying yes or no to someone rule response (A) is "'[if saying yes][otherwise]No[end if]', [regarding the player][hai] risposto.[paragraph break]'Ma non [ti] [regarding the current interlocutor][hai] chiesto nulla', [hai] puntualizzato.".


Conversation Rules IT ends here.